As Agence France Presse sees
it, things have gotten pretty grim for American Muslims in the five years
since the Al Qaida attacks on New York and Washington.
“Discrimination and harassment by law enforcement have come to plague
American Muslims,” Mira Oberman reported from Dearborn, Michigan on
September 3. “There have been suspicious looks, slurs, physical attacks,
extra screening at airports and arrests on groundless charges. And it seems
to be getting worse.”
The piece was triggered by a Council on American Islamic Relations report
released in early September that indicated a 30 percent jump in complaints
by American Muslims of incidents of harassment, violence, and discriminatory
behavior between 2004 and 2005.
As the fifth anniversary of 9/11 crept up, there was also a remarkable surge
in journalistic interest in the lives of American Muslims, with hundreds of
stories published or broadcast by outlets all over the nation. In recent
years, the only comparable outpouring came immediately after the attacks,
when many American newspapers and broadcast outlets produced very ambitious
series on Islam in America and in the world.
In September, for example, the Washington Post, the Denver Post,
the St. Petersburg Times, National Public Radio, the San Francisco
Chronicle, and the Houston Chronicle all published or broadcast
multi-day series on American Muslims, often calling them “9/11: Five Years
Later.”
Little of this reporting mirrored the bleak tenor of the AFP dispatch. (In
fact, Rick Casey of the Houston Chronicle published a column on
September 10 under the non-facetious-headline, “Why you should hug a
Muslim.” Casey emphasized the loyalty of Houston’s large Muslim community
and closed his column by quoting one local Muslim leader who said, “If a
terrorist group gets active, you don’t think it will be Joe White Guy who
will turn them in, do you?”)
The current situation is different from and more complicated than other war
time moments, such as the broad attack on German culture and identity that
took place during World War I, or the incarceration of Japanese-Americans
that took place during World War II.
It took only a month, for example, for California newspapers to go from
vouching for the loyalty of that state’s Japanese-Americans to universal
endorsement of the practice of expropriation and preventive detention for
the state’s entire Japanese-American population. By contrast, in five years
President Bush has moved only from describing Islam as a “religion of peace”
to the point where he argues that “Islamic fascists” have infected some
portions of the world’s Muslim population.
And yet, it is clear that these are challenging times to be a Muslim in
America. Pervasively, Muslims report a sense of pressure, tension, and
suspicion. USA Today reporter Marilyn Ellis’ August 10 piece, for
example, focused on the psychological costs of the situation. It ran under
the headline, “USA’s Muslims are under fire; Harassment, discrimination rise
after 9/11, leaving many feeling ostracized.”
Ellis began her story by describing the recent experiences of 28-year-old
Motaz ElShafi, a New Jersey-born and bred software engineer, who opened an
office email message from a colleague at Cisco Systems in North Carolina and
found the salutation: “Dear Terrorist.” The message went on to condemn the
terrorist bombing of commuter trains in Mumbai, India.
“I was furious,” ElShafi told Ellis. “What did I have to do with this
violence?”
From Ohio came similar reports. A Cleveland Plain-Dealer report on
Arab-American life published on September 10 began with two teenagers’
account of their experiences of hearing the news of the attack on the World
Trade Center. “It was during second-period science class,” Shady Herbawi,
now 18, told reporter Robert L. Smith. “All I remember is all the faces
turning and looking at me.”
Many in Ohio experienced a tremendous sense of loss in the period following
the attacks on New York and Washington. “We were accepted, respected,” Naila
Assad told Smith, noting that she spoke “as if recalling a former place.”
Freddie Ahmad, a Palestinian-American pharmacist told Smith: “You worry. You
worry. Every 9/11 you get an ulcer.”
The 9/11 bombings rattled him and many others, Sharihar Ahmed told
Jerry F. Boone of the Portland
Oregonian in a story published September 13. “Right after the
bombings we were scared. I think every one of us was afraid in a different
way.”
“If I went to the airport, I didn’t know how to act,” said Ahmed, president
of the Bilal Mosque in suburban Beaverton. “I felt like everyone was looking
at me. If I smiled, I thought they would think I was up to something. If I
didn’t smile maybe they thought I was planning something. Should I make eye
contact? Or not? Should I say hello or just be quiet?”
But an important part of Ahmed’s 9/11 experience worked in the opposite
direction—the unexpected positive response of many Oregonians who wanted to
reassure Muslims. “Members of other churches reached out to us, offering
support and encouragement. Instead of feeling threatened, we felt
protected.”
ElShafi, the Cisco engineer, told USA Today something similar. His
company asked the emailing counterterrorist to apologize and ElShafi said
that part of his 9/11 experience was the support of co-workers. “After 9/11
people would say, ‘Don’t worry Taz, we’ve got your back.’”
Law enforcement officials get a much weaker vote of confidence from Muslims,
however. Among the most common complaints, especially among men, has been
the way they have been targeted by various post-9/11 security regimes,
especially at airports. Azhar Usman, a successful Muslim standup comic, told
the St. Petersburg Times on September 16 that he needs to arrive at
the airport a month in advance to get through preflight security. (The best
joke in Usman’s Muslim schtick: “I’m a Muslim, but I am an American Muslim.
In fact, I consider myself a very patriotic American Muslim, which means I
would die for this country by blowing myself up.”)
Many other Muslim leaders told journalists of similar delays and problems at
U.S. airports and borders. Others had harsher tales to tell, like
20-year-old, American-born Osama Abulhassan, the son of Lebanese immigrants,
who told Agence France Presse that in July he was arrested in Ohio when he
and a friend were reported to authorities for buying a large number of
pre-paid cell phones. After a week in jail, they were released and all
charges dropped.
“We’re still proud to be Americans and of our heritage, but you experience
something like that it’s going to change you the way you see things,” he
said. “It makes us feel, not hatred…I’ve lost confidence in the justice
system in general and the way things are done here.”
In Oregon, Muslims remember the arrest of convert Brandon Mayfield, a lawyer
who was arrested by FBI agents who told reporters that Mayfield’s
fingerprints were found at the scene of some of the Madrid bombings in 2004.
The government later released Mayfield with an apology after admitting that
his finger prints didn’t match those found at the scene. “After Brandon was
arrested people really pulled back,” Jamal AbuSneineh of the Bilal Mosque
told the Oregonian. “Attendance at the mosque really fell off. It’s
come back now, but people are still on edge.”
At the murkier end of things are government prosecutions that have led to
terrorism convictions of American residents in Buffalo and Washington, among
other places. In the Washington case, in particular, it was clear that
federal prosecutors are taking a very aggressive stance against suspected
terrorists, filing charges and pressing for very lengthy sentences against
suspects long before any of them took concrete action.
Mary Beth Sheridan of the Washington Post anatomized one such case in
a lengthy piece that ran on page one on September 3 under the headline:
“Hardball Tactics in an Era of Threats: To the government, they were a
terrorist risk in the Washington area. To local Muslims they were unfairly
singled out for prosecution and severe sentences in a post 9/11 world.”
Sheridan’s story focused on Ali Asad Chandia, a 29-year-old third grade
teacher from suburban Maryland, who was the 11th man convicted of being a
member of a terrorist network constructed by a local Islamist imam named Ali
al-Timini, now serving a life sentence.
Members of al-Timini’s circle at the Dar al-Arqam mosque in suburban Falls
Church, including Chandia, spent time in Pakistan after 9/11, where they
were connected with a Pakistani group called Laskar-e-Taiba, which aims to
drive India out of Kashmir. After training with Laskar-e-Taiba, the Dar al-Arqam
group was added the American list of terrorist organizations.
Chandia, the son of Pakistani immigrants, was never linked to any concrete
plans to conduct any sort of terror against the United States. Instead, he
was charged with conspiracy and other crimes for doing favors for Laskar
operatives visiting Washington—picking them up at the airport, letting them
use his computer, and, most of all, mailing 21 boxes of paintball cartridges
(which might be used in military training) to Pakistan. He also had radical
Muslim texts and compact disks in his possession when arrested.
Sheridan reported that federal prosecutors said they wanted to send a
message “of zero tolerance for terrorism-related” activities. “Did we break
something up? Yeah, we think we did,” an unnamed law enforcement official
told Sheridan. “But we would not profess to say we have anything more than
the potential for it.”
As punishment for potential terrorism, prosecutors sought a sentence of 30
years to life for Chandia, which left many Washington area Muslims aghast.
Sheridan quoted Paul J. McCarthy, the deputy U.S. attorney general, as
describing the “preventive prosecutions” as an alternative preferable to
“awaiting an attack.”
The aggressive use of informers and trying to induce some suspects to
testify against their colleagues in exchange for greatly reduced sentences
are hardly new. Such tactics were used relentlessly to dismantle the Black
Panthers, the Ku Klux Klan, and anti-war activist organizations during the
1960s and 1970s. But they have come as a shock to many Muslims. (Three of
the men accused of going to the Laskar training camp were induced to plead
guilty and testify against the others. They served three-year terms.)
“He mailed something. So what?” a woman whose sons studied in Chandia’s
third grade class told the Post. “If this is how you deliver justice,
you lose trust in the justice system,” protested her husband, Muddasar
Ahmed.
Many journalists reported on these sorts of strains and fears among
Muslims about American justice,
but several other broad trends also popped up.
American journalists were very interested in comparing the American Muslim
community with those in Europe, given that Britain, France, Germany, the
Netherlands, Denmark, and Spain have all experienced some combination of
terror bombings, acts of rebellion, or powerful disaffection among their
Muslim minorities.
No one sees much activism in Muslim America. “It’s worth keeping in mind
that America’s Muslim community is strikingly different from those in
Britain and the rest of Europe,” Peter Skerry wrote in the August 21 edition
of Time. “American Muslims tend to be university-educated
professionals living in the suburbs,” not impoverished folk jammed into
enclaves in European cities.
“The U.S. Muslim community is less likely to breed disaffection. In fact,
it’s probably the most diverse in the world, haling from many parts of the
globe, speaking numerous languages and practicing several different versions
of Islam.”
“A major difference is that America is used to being a nation of immigrants,
while Europe, for most of the 19th and early 20th century was a net exporter
of people, mostly to the New World,” H.D.S. Greenway wrote in his May 20
Boston Globe column. “Europeans cannot quite accept that they are now a
target for immigrants in the way the United States has long been.”
The Economist chipped in by pointing to America’s “aggressive
tolerance of religious difference and of public displays of faith.”
It is also clear that American Muslims have responded to the post 9/11
atmosphere by drastically increasing their presence in the American public
square—not that their pre-9/11 profile had been all that low.
In November of 2004, Laurie Goodstein of the New York Times reported
that Muslim organizations like the Council on American Islamic Relations
were successfully ramping up, noting that the organization’s Washington
office had doubled its annual budget to $3 million since 2001 and that the
number of state branches had increased from nine to 29 over the same period.
Over the same period, the Los Angeles-based Muslim Public Affairs Council
increased its budget from $300,000 to $1 million.
A September 8 story by Louis Sahagun of the Los Angeles Times,
headlined “Muslim Americans reassess how they portray their faith in
public,” hit another note that sounded frequently in recent journalism.
Members of a “diverse, reclusive, and largely immigrant community” were
taking personal initiatives to show their neighbors who they are and what
they believe,” Sahagun wrote.
“With people being arrested left and right and negative images of Muslims
filling the news, I told my sons to keep a low profile,” said Zubeida Khan,
a 49 year-old housewife and immigrant from India who lives in La Hambra
Heights. But she decided that she herself had to become an Islamic outreach
worker in community politics, participating in door-to-door campaigns for
city council candidates, serving on a city budget advisory committee, and
joining a local hospital board of trustees, as well as the Muslim Public
Affairs council.
“In becoming more assertive in the public arena, I’ve made a statement about
who I am at a time when a few unreasonable radicals have high-jacked public
attention,” Khan told Sahagun. “We have to make it loud and clear to other
Muslims and our communities that we stick to the principles of the Koran and
the life of the prophet.”
In many places a pragmatic streak about what it takes to be successful in
America is on display.
“As Muslims often put it,” Peter Skerry wrote in his Time column,
“‘This is how America treats its minorities. But they overcame it, and so
will we.’ In other words, Muslims never sound so American as when asserting
their rights against government policies they consider unjust.”
“We need to stop being so isolated. We need to contact our neighbors and
tell them we are Muslim,” Imam Abdul Wahid, whose Friday sermon was quoted
on September 6 in the San Antonio News-Express. “We need to talk to
our neighbors. There is an uncomfortable feeling that it creates when you
remain isolated.”
Azhar Usman, the Muslim comic, agreed, telling the St. Petersburg Times
that “9/11 was a wakeup call for me personally and for the American Muslim
community to stop being lazy in terms of avoiding talking about the hard
issues in our community.”
Among the hard issues felt in many American communities is the question of
what will become of the second generation of immigrant Muslim-Americans. The
general consensus is that many of this generation are feeling the tug of
Islam, and struggling to find a way to live more fully as Muslims than many
of their parents. (Not that this is something new under the sun for American
immigrants—it was also common among Catholics in 19th century America.)
“A new generation of American Muslims—living in the shadow of the September
11, 2001 attacks—is becoming more religious,” Genevieve Abdo, author of the
recently published book, “Mecca and Main Street: Muslim Life in America
After 9/11,” wrote in the Washington Post August 27. “They are more
likely to take comfort in their own communities, and less likely to embrace
the nation’s fabled melting pot of shared values and common culture.”
Some of the more interesting reporting explored the terrain of choices for
the young. For example, a news feature story by Tara Bahrampour of the
Washington Post published on September 4 compared the experiences of two
young Muslim men in the Washington area.
Amin Al-Sharaf, a George Washington University student and leader of the
local Muslim Students Association, wants dialogue with American culture and
thinks it is necessary to confront radical Islam. He described his parent’s
generation as nervous about politics and said they point their children
toward engineering or medicine.
“They say going into politics is dangerous, you’ll get corrupted, you’ll
lose your religion,” Al-Sharaf told Bahrampour. He is now in law school
after a summer working at the state department.
The other man featured was Basim Hawa, a 27-year-old software consultant and
the son of Palestinian immigrants. He returned to strict Muslim observance
after a foray into hedonistic American life during high school and college.
In those days, Hawa told Bahrampour, he “hung out with friends, went out a
lot, went out to clubs, and dated, and partied… I never had doubt of my
religion, but it just wasn’t on my mind a lot.” That changed when he signed
up for a pilgrimage to Mecca sponsored by the All Dulles Area Muslim Society
in 2002.
The experience of the haj, surrounded by 3 million other Muslims, was
transformational. “I never stepped back into a club; I never stepped back
into a casino; I never touched alcohol; I never dated or approached a girl.”
Another “issue story” that came up frequently in recent months focused on
the Muslim practice of women covering their heads with scarves as an
expression of piety and modesty. These scarves, it turns out, can be
remarkably provocative to American non-Muslims and lead to surprising
confrontations and even to what is often perceived as job discrimination.
In northern California, one Muslim woman told Genevieve Adbo that deciding
to wear a hijab was part of her spiritual renewal. “After I covered,
I changed. I felt I wanted to give people a good impression of Islam. I
wanted people to know how happy I am to be a Muslim. But that’s not always
the message that other Americans receive.”
In 2003, Adbo wrote, the woman was shopping in a supermarket and the man
standing next to her in the vegetable section turned abruptly and said,
“You’d be much more beautiful without that thing on your head. It’s
demeaning to women.”
Jafumba Assad, a 32-year-old community college teacher in Tulsa, told
Marilyn Ellis of USA Today of a far more frightening confrontation.
In a Wal-Mart parking lot, “two men approached her and aggressively shouted
‘Y’all ought to be f---ing locked up.’ Pregnant at the time, she quickly
backed away and then realized there were parked cars behind her.” She
cowered there, worried that she was about to be attacked, but the men walked
away.
National Public Radio’s Judy Woodruff found herself in the suburban Chicago
living room of two young sisters after
shopping for a brown head-scarf with the girls for her report, “The
Inner Journey of Young Muslims in America,” broadcast on September 15. She
asked the Boundaouis sisters how many headscarves they owned (110) and why
they wear them.
The sisters said they each had made an individual choice to wear the
hijab (their mother does, but her sisters don’t) and that they like to
joke about what they call the hijab tax. “Because before we go out
anywhere, like whatever, just going to the store, our mom’s always telling
us, ‘You’re representing. You’re representing,’” Iman Boundaoui said.
“You’re wearing the scarf. Everybody looks at you.”
Neil MacFarquhar, newly reassigned from the New York Times’ Cairo
Bureau to a new beat covering American Muslims, produced a hijab
story as one of his first efforts, headlined, “A Simple Scarf, But Meaning
Much More Than Faith.”
The post 9/11 period has been most difficult for the small group of American
Muslims associated with the strict and intense reform movement called
Salafism. Ali al-Timini and Ali Asad Chandia of the Northern Virginia jihad
network were Washington Salafis, but the movement is far larger than
just the Islamist fringe. Caryle Murphy of the Washington Post wrote
an excellent exploration of the crisis of the Salafi movement, published on
page one on September 5.
“Salafis are the fundamentalists of the Muslim world,” Ihsan Baby, a
professor of the Islamic studies at the University of Kentucky told her.
“Just as Christian fundamentalists are focused on who’s going to heaven and
hell, who’s the true believer and who’s the non-believer, Salafis are really
focused on belief.”
Murphy opened her story by describing a debate among a group of seventh and
eighth grade girls who go to the Al-Huda School of the Dar-us-Salaam mosque
on the question: “Is a segregated, all-Islamic upbringing the key to
protecting your Muslim identity?” Eight of the dozen agree that it was,
reflecting the Salafi sense that true believers should live apart
from the non-Muslim community as much as possible.
Murphy noted that most Salafis are apolitical and that Salafism was not
merely the project of Islamists like al-Timini. The Saudi government had
been vigorously promoting Salafism in the United States until it shut down a
program in January at the request of the state department.
For Salafis, intense discussion continues about how compatible their
brand of faith is with America. Murphy quoted the recorded lectures of Safi
Kahn, the American-born imam of Dar-us-Salaam mosque in suburban College
Park, Maryland, on this point.
“Young Muslims in particular must be aware of the dangers to their faith,
Khan says, ‘because youth is the time when there are a lot of
temptations…when all these Ivy League universities try to take you to
brainwash you into the way they want you to grow up, the way they want you
to think.’ It is the time ‘that all of America, all of the West, tries to
concentrate on you…because once they control you…then they have you for the
rest of your life, you think like them.’”
At the same time, there are powerful Muslim impulses to avoid Muslim
fundamentalism. Writing in the June 18 New York Times, Laurie
Goodstein called attention to the work of two highly influential American
imams Sheik Hamza Yusuf and Imam Zid Shakir—both American converts—who
praise what they call “the rejectionist generation” of young Muslims who
seek an authentic and cosmopolitan middle path between modernism and
fundamentalism.
Based at the Zaytuna Institute in San Francisco, they preach a message that
“both Islam and America have gone seriously astray, and that American
Muslims have a responsibility to harness their growing numbers and economic
power to help set them straight,” Goodstein wrote.
Yusuf and Shakir stand for an intellectualy rigorous form of orthodox Islam
rooted in scripture study and in the sense that the faith preserves several
diverse intellectual streams, Goodstein wrote. The Zaytuna Institute is an
evolving Muslim educational center that stages very popular “mobile
madrasses” that attract hundreds of young Muslim professionals on the West
Coast and in cities like Houston and is struggling to build the first
American Muslim seminary in Hayward, Calfornia.
Yusuf’s “diagnosis of the problem with Islam today is that its followers
lack religious knowledge,” Goodstein wrote. “Islam, like Judaism, is based
on scripture and law that has been interpreted, reinterpreted, and debated
for centuries by scholars who inspired four schools of Islamic
jurisprudence….Mr. Yusuf laments that many of the seminaries that once
flourished in the Muslim world are now either gone or intellectually dead.
Now, he said, the sharpest Muslim students go into technical fields like
engineering, not religion.”
And there is still more ferment among American Muslims, including plenty of
stuff to make Salafis and other conservatives batten down the hatches. Last
year, Amina Haduda, an African-American Muslim woman who teaches Islamic
studies at Virginia Commonwealth University, led salat prayers in New
York City, to great controversy.
Beyond the transgressing of traditional women’s roles lies the whole wild
realm of North American hybrid culture. Over the summer, the Religion News
Service moved a story about a search on the Internet by gay Muslim men
interested in lesbian partners for marriages of convenience that would keep
their families happy and keep other Muslims off their backs.
Then there’s “taqwacore,” the product of a “new breed of American Muslims,”
described by documentary film maker Omar Majeed in the September 11
Montreal Gazette. It blends orthodox Islam and punk rock and is
spreading in appeal among young North American Muslims.
According to Majeed, taqwacore (the root word means “God
consciousness” in Arabic) springs from a popular novel by Michael Muhammad
Knight, a 27 year-old American convert educated in a Pakistani madrassa,
whose novel depicts a world of “burqa-wearing feminists leading prayer,
spunky mohawked punkers and holy pranksters.”
“Stories like these help me regain some of that childhood sense of
integration,” Majeed wrote. “If punk and Islam can find a way to intersect,
then maybe anything is possible. Out of divorced cultures may come new
marriages.”