Congress Gets
a None
by
Juhem Navarro-Rivera
Conventional wisdom, backed up by survey data, says that no one is less
likely to be elected president of the United States than a professed
atheist. Yet voters are beginning to send to Washington politicians who
claim no religion identity—a sign of the growing acceptance of “Nones” in
American society.
The rise of the Nones has been widely recognized since the release of the
2008 Trinity-American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS), which found
that 15 percent of Americans answer “none” when asked, “What is your
religion, if any.” In the intervening years, the percentage of Nones has
continued to rise, at a rate comparable to the 1990s, when they increased
their share of the population from eight to 14 percent.
According to the 2013 Economic Values Survey of the Public Religion Research
Institute (PRRI), Nones now constitute 21 percent of all American adults,
and 35 percent of those under 30.
To be sure, Nones are not easy to pin down. As the Trinity-ARIS report,
American Nones: The Profile of the No-religion Population, points out,
“‘None’ is not a movement, but a label for a diverse group of people who do
not identify with any of the myriad of religious options in the American
religious marketplace.”
Nones are defined by what they are not—not religious. Many of them believe
in God, as either a personal deity or as some kind of “higher power.” Others
are outright atheists and agnostics. Still others are simply indifferent to
religion and/or divinity.
Nevertheless, they embrace similar positions on many social and political
issues, and are beginning to identify themselves as Nones. They have,
willy-nilly, become a significant part of America’s religious and cultural
scene.
When Barack Obama won reelection in 2012 the media focused on the lopsided
margins that the President received from racial and ethnic minorities,
particularly Hispanic-Americans (71 percent to 27 percent) and
Asian-Americans (73-26 percent). But the president received a comparable
70-26 percent margin from the Nones.
A few reporters did take note. Nones have become “to the Democratic Party
what evangelicals are to Republicans,” wrote the Orlando Sentinel’s Jeff
Kunerth on November 13, 2012. Liz Halloran made the same point a month later
on National Public Radio.
Yet despite becoming a significant part of the Democratic coalition, the
Nones have only a handful of senators and members of Congress to call their
own. Only one, Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ), openly identifies as a None. An
additional 10 (all Democrats) simply decline to give a religious identity,
according to the latest CQ compilation of congressional demographic data.
Sinema was first elected to Congress last year, winning a close race in a
newly created 9th district that comprises south Phoenix and all of Tempe,
home of Arizona State University. A social worker turned lawyer, she grew up
in Tucson in a conservative Mormon family.
While serving in the Arizona state legislature she spoke to the Humanist
Society of Greater Pheonix and received an “Award for the Advancement of
Science and Reason in Public Policy” from the Center for Inquiry, one of the
country’s leading secularist organizations.
On election eve, Hemant Mehta, author of
the popular Friendly Atheist blog on the Patheos website, lamented the
defeat of Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA), a Unitarian who came out as Congress’ only
“non-theist” (as he called himself) in 2007. Stark’s loss to fellow Democrat
Eric Swalwell after 40 years in the House of Representatives was “especially
bittersweet,” Mehta wrote, because Swalwell had used Stark’s opposition to
reaffirming “In God We Trust” as the national motto against him.
But Mehta took heart at the apparent victory of Sinema, who was “believed to
be both an atheist and bisexual, though she hasn’t spoken about either in
her capacity as a politician.” After her election was confirmed, both
Politico’s Patrick Gavin and Kimberly Winston of RNS described Sinema as the
sole atheist in Congress and the atheist blogosphere rejoiced.
Chris Lombardi of the Secular Coalition for America wrote that, despite
Stark’s loss, the SCA was “feeling emboldened by [Sinema’s] apparent
victory” because “her nonbelief was not a factor in her election.”
Bisexuality was one thing, but atheist? Soon after her election a spokesman
for the Sinema campaign responded to Winston’s story in an email: “Kyrsten
believes the terms ‘nontheist,’ ‘atheist’ or ‘nonbeliever’ are not befitting
of her life’s work or personal character. Though Sinema was raised in a
religious household, she draws her policy-making decisions from her
experience as a social worker who worked with diverse communities and as a
lawmaker who represented hundreds of thousands.”
The atheist community was not happy. “In an election with so many historic
firsts,” wrote Mehta, “the one group that seems to be taking a step backward
are atheists.”
Chris Stedman, assistant Humanist chaplain at Harvard University, posted on
the CNN Belief Blog that he was “disheartened that the only member of
Congress who openly identifies as nonreligious has forcefully distanced
herself from atheism in a way that puts down those of us who do not believe
in God.” Atheists, he added, “are Americans of good character, too.”
Stark, by contrast, thanked them for their support in an open letter in
Friendly Atheist.
Yet Sinema seemed a more natural fit for the None community with which she
identified, for just 18 percent of Nones identify as atheist, according to
the 2013 Economic Values Survey.
In March, PRRI and the Brookings Institution’s Religion, Values, and
Immigration Reform Survey asked whether particular groups were changing
America for the better or for the worse. Atheists and people with no
religion were considered twice as likely to be changing America for the
worse than for the better, the ratio growing to four-to-one when it came to
atheists alone. (To be sure, in both cases, nearly half the respondents
thought that they had no impact at all.)
Sinema’s election does appear to signal the political mainstreaming of the
Nones. But whether a professed atheist can win a seat in Congress, much less
the presidency, remains an open question.
|